Topics Topics Edit Profile Profile Help/Instructions Help Member List Member List  
Search Last 1|3|7 Days Search Search Tree View Tree View  

Rate Post

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Scott Corder
Moderator
Username: Scott_corder

Post Number: 10
Registered: 01-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Thursday, April 14, 2005 - 12:08 am:   

I am finding these recent posts very informative! I don't have much to add but want to reiterate something I posted a long time ago (a copy/paste of that follows):

If you read a post I made much earlier in this same thread on the bulletin board, I mentioned some very strict advice I received from Martec concerning matching prop pitch to the gearbox on the engine. To reiterate: Martec was adamant that the prop be properly matched to each specific Yanmar gearbox to generate maximum thrust at approx 2900 rpm. Anything different and they said bad things could (would) happen (clutch burn out, engine damage, etc.) They also indicated that Yanmar shipped 2GMs with several different gearboxes on a totally unpredictable basis (just whatever gearbox they happened to have on the shelf as they made each engine). This, they said, obviously prevented them from providing any kind of widely applicable formula for prop size and pitch on a Yanmar 2GM.

+++
This being said, recent findings seeem valuable but we should remain mindful of the gearbox issues.

Administration Administration Log Out Log Out