Topics Topics Edit Profile Profile Help/Instructions Help Member List Member List  
Search Last 1|3|7 Days Search Search Tree View Tree View  

Rate Post

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Scott Corder (Pastcommodore)

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Friday, April 13, 2001 - 09:09 am:   

Great question! As someone who has actually misplaced his babystay (after I removed it years ago), your query causes me to wonder the very same thing (I can't believe I never wondered my self).

Two options come immedieately to mind:
1. If you're never going to use the pad-eye again, why not remove the strap? It would make the V-berth just that more comfortable and (in my case) further facilitate some sort of "child restraint" barricade for when we sleep on the boat with our 2 year old twins (who we have tried with limited success in the past to confine to the V-berth). But alas, we may have to move them to the settees this year for other resons - it's just too early to tell. Suffice to say, it's likely to get interesting given their curent mobility and curiosity!

2. Leave the tie-strap in place and use the pad eye as the lead for the foreguy to the spinnaker pole (instead of the track on the foredeck). Several folks I know have tried or are using this method to reduce the strain on the foredeck track. It creates a far less "forward" point of load for the foreguy (and somewhat reduces the need to constantly re-adjust the foreguy every time you move the pole to trim).

I'd be interested to know if anyone has any other thoughts on this subject.

Administration Administration Log Out Log Out